Lafond v. Jetzkowitz

New York Supreme Court

Lafond v. Jetzkowitz

17 Abb. N. Cas. 87

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Abb. N. Cas. 87 (Lafond v. Jetzkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lafond v. Jetzkowitz, 17 Abb. N. Cas. 87 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, J.

—Under the former Code, a trial fee

could be taxed for every trial, and where on the first trial the jury disagreed, and upon the second trial found a verdict for the defendant, it was held that the defendant could tax two trial fees (Hamilton v. Butler, 19 Abb. Pr. 446; Spring v. Day, 44 How. Pr. 390; Cregin v. Brooklyn Crosstown R. R. Co., 19 Hun, 349). The question is not free from doubt, but I think that [88]*88a trial fee may still be taxed for each trial, and that the decisions heretofore made as to what constitutes a trial are applicable under the new Code.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, J.

—Under the former Code, a trial fee

could be taxed for every trial, and where on the first trial the jury disagreed, and upon the second trial found a verdict for the defendant, it was held that the defendant could tax two trial fees (Hamilton v. Butler, 19 Abb. Pr. 446; Spring v. Day, 44 How. Pr. 390; Cregin v. Brooklyn Crosstown R. R. Co., 19 Hun, 349). The question is not free from doubt, but I think that [88]*88a trial fee may still be taxed for each trial, and that the decisions heretofore made as to what constitutes a trial are applicable under the new Code.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Abb. N. Cas. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafond-v-jetzkowitz-nysupct-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack