Lafond v. Jetzkowitz

17 Abb. N. Cas. 87
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Andrews, J.

—Under the former Code, a trial fee

could be taxed for every trial, and where on the first trial the jury disagreed, and upon the second trial found a verdict for the defendant, it was held that the defendant could tax two trial fees (Hamilton v. Butler, 19 Abb. Pr. 446; Spring v. Day, 44 How. Pr. 390; Cregin v. Brooklyn Crosstown R. R. Co., 19 Hun, 349). The question is not free from doubt, but I think that [88] a trial fee may still be taxed for each trial, and that the decisions heretofore made as to what constitutes a trial are applicable under the new Code.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lafond v. Jetzkowitz, 17 Abb. N. Cas. 87 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

17 Abb. N. Cas. 87 (Lafond v. Jetzkowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Engberman v. North German Lloyd Steamship Co.
84 N.Y.S. 199 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)