LaFlower v. McDonough

937 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14741, 2006 WL 2505133
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-4777
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 937 So. 2d 722 (LaFlower v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaFlower v. McDonough, 937 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14741, 2006 WL 2505133 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file an administrative grievance challenging the deductions from his account for legal copying, pursuant to Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections, 920 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), review denied, 923 So.2d 1162 (Fla.2006).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mann v. State
937 So. 2d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14741, 2006 WL 2505133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laflower-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.