Lafleur v. Molitar

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Lafleur v. Molitar

356 So. 2d 550, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3789

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 6, 1978

DocketNo. 6254

StatusPublished

This text of 356 So. 2d 550 (Lafleur v. Molitar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lafleur v. Molitar, 356 So. 2d 550, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3789 (La. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a companion case consolidated for trial with LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company, 356 So.2d 537, our Docket # 6252, decided this date.

This is a suit by Danny Glenn Lafleur the driver of the ambulance belonging to Ar-doin’s of Mamou, Inc. Lafleur sues for injuries and losses sustained by him in this accident. Numerous interventions, cross claims, and third party demands are made involving most of the parties in the LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company case. There was judgment by the trial court denying Lafleur’s demands as well as denying all interventions and third party plaintiff demands. The trial court denies all demands made in this proceeding and rules that numerous other cross claims were dismissed as moot.

For the reasons assigned in the LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company case, 356 So.2d 537, our Docket No. 6252, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a companion case consolidated for trial with LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company, 356 So.2d 537, our Docket # 6252, decided this date.

This is a suit by Danny Glenn Lafleur the driver of the ambulance belonging to Ar-doin’s of Mamou, Inc. Lafleur sues for injuries and losses sustained by him in this accident. Numerous interventions, cross claims, and third party demands are made involving most of the parties in the LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company case. There was judgment by the trial court denying Lafleur’s demands as well as denying all interventions and third party plaintiff demands. The trial court denies all demands made in this proceeding and rules that numerous other cross claims were dismissed as moot.

For the reasons assigned in the LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company case, 356 So.2d 537, our Docket No. 6252, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 So. 2d 550, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafleur-v-molitar-lactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack