Lafleur v. Douglass

Washington Territory

Lafleur v. Douglass

1 Wash. Terr. 185

DecidedDecember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wash. Terr. 185 (Lafleur v. Douglass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lafleur v. Douglass, 1 Wash. Terr. 185 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Wyche, Associate Justice.

In this case a general demurrer was filed to the complaint below, on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and a pro forma judgment rendered sustaining the demurrer, and by agreement an appeal is prosecuted here from this pro forma judgment.

The general demurrer, filed below, admits the statement of facts in the complaint to be true, and the complaint, we think, discloses a cause of action.

If the complaint is defective, a special demurrer to the defective portion is the proper proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wyche, Associate Justice.

In this case a general demurrer was filed to the complaint below, on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and a pro forma judgment rendered sustaining the demurrer, and by agreement an appeal is prosecuted here from this pro forma judgment.

The general demurrer, filed below, admits the statement of facts in the complaint to be true, and the complaint, we think, discloses a cause of action.

If the complaint is defective, a special demurrer to the defective portion is the proper proceeding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wash. Terr. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafleur-v-douglass-washterr-1862.