Lafleur Et Ux. v. Zelenko

143 A. 927, 101 Vt. 414, 1928 Vt. LEXIS 169
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lafleur Et Ux. v. Zelenko. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 Vt. 64
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided November 26, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal, together with a bill of exceptions therein, by the defendants from a decree under the mandate of this Court in LaFleur et ux. v. Zelenko et al., 101 Vt. 64, 141 Atl. 603. The appeal is based on the ground that no specific route of the right of way in question was designated therein. But as the decree seems to be in accordance with the mandate of this Court the exceptions are overruled, the appeal is dismissed, without prejudice however and without costs, and cause remanded.

Let the defendants, if so advised, apply to the court of chancery for such relief as they may be entitled to in accordance with the procedure marked out in Stevens v. McRae, 97 Vt. 76, 81-82, 122 Atl. 892.

By order of Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lafleur Et Ux. v. Zelenko, 143 A. 927, 101 Vt. 414, 1928 Vt. LEXIS 169 (Vt. 1928).

143 A. 927 (Lafleur Et Ux. v. Zelenko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stevens v. MacRae
122 A. 892 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1923)
Lafleur Et Ux. v. Zelenko
141 A. 603 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1928)