Lafler v. Monroe Circuit Judge

77 N.W. 265, 118 Mich. 677
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 1898·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the Monroe circuit court against one Fisher, a saloon keeper, and his bondsmen, in the sum of $5,000. The penalty of the bond was but $3,000. The defendants moved for a new trial, and the court ordered that a new trial be granted unless the plaintiff remit down to the penalty of the bond. The plaintiff, on the hearing of the motion, asked for judgment for $3,000 against the sureties, and for the amount of the verdict, $5,000, against the principal. This application was denied, and mandamus' is now sought to compel the circuit judge to enter such order.

The action is joint. A satisfaction by one defendant would discharge the action. There is no provision of. statute for severing in an action ex delicto, or for entering a judgment in one sum against one defendant, and in a greater sum against another.

The writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lafler v. Monroe Circuit Judge, 77 N.W. 265, 118 Mich. 677 (Mich. 1898).

77 N.W. 265 (Lafler v. Monroe Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartman v. Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Inc.
170 N.W.2d 292 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)
Merrinane v. Miller
118 N.W. 11 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)