Home/Supreme Court/Lafler v. Cooper

Lafler v. Cooper

178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1127, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 10, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 2011
DocketNo. 10-209
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 622 (Lafler v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lafler v. Cooper, 178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1127, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 10, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “What remedy, if any, should be provided for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargain negotiations if the defendant was later convicted and sentenced pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures?”

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 563.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. David Braxton
456 F. App'x 242 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Ham v. Commissioner of Correction
23 A.3d 682 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Kerr v. Thurmer
639 F.3d 315 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1127, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 10, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafler-v-cooper-scotus-2011.