Lafler v. Cooper
178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1127, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 10, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 2011·No. No. 10-209·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “What remedy, if any, should be provided for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargain negotiations if the defendant was later convicted and sentenced pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures?”
Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 563.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lafler v. Cooper, 178 L. Ed. 2d 622, 131 S. Ct. 856, 562 U.S. 1127, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 10, 79 U.S.L.W. 3397 (U.S. 2011).
178 L. Ed. 2d 622 (Lafler v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. David Braxton
456 F. App'x 242 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
Ham v. Commissioner of Correction
23 A.3d 682 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Kerr v. Thurmer
639 F.3d 315 (Seventh Circuit, 2011)