Lafky v. Albert
This text of 137 P. 208 (Lafky v. Albert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an action for libel. The defendant demurred on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We have examined the record, and are of the opinion that the language used is not libelous per se; and, there being no innuendo, the demurrer was properly sustained. As no good purpose would be served by perpetuating in the Oregon Reports the article over which the action arose, we omit it from the opinion.
The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 P. 208, 68 Or. 373, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafky-v-albert-or-1913.