Lafitte v. Schunamann

92 S.E. 295, 19 Ga. App. 799, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 369
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 25, 1917·No. 8309·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

This suit was against the owner of an automobile, for injuries sustained by the plaintiff by reason of having been struck by the automobile. The evidence of the plaintiff showed, without contradiction, that the automobile, at the time it struck him, was being driven by one who ivas not in the employ of the owner of the automobile, and who was driving it without the knowledge or consent of the owner. Eeld, that the court did not err in granting a nonsuit. Fielder v. Davison, 139 Ga. 509 (77 S. E. 618); Wooley v. Doby, ante, 797.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lafitte v. Schunamann, 92 S.E. 295, 19 Ga. App. 799, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 369 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

92 S.E. 295 (Lafitte v. Schunamann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Sheffield
173 S.E.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Johnson v. Webb-Crawford Co., Inc.
80 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Graham v. Cleveland
200 S.E. 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Samples v. Shaw
170 S.E. 389 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Whitelock v. Dennis
116 A. 68 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1921)