Lafitte v. Schunamann
This text of 92 S.E. 295 (Lafitte v. Schunamann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was against the owner of an automobile, for injuries sustained by the plaintiff by reason of having been struck by the automobile. The evidence of the plaintiff showed, without contradiction, that the automobile, at the time it struck him, was being driven by one who ivas not in the employ of the owner of the automobile, and who was driving it without the knowledge or consent of the owner. Eeld, that the court did not err in granting a nonsuit. Fielder v. Davison, 139 Ga. 509 (77 S. E. 618); Wooley v. Doby, ante, 797.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 295, 19 Ga. App. 799, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafitte-v-schunamann-gactapp-1917.