Lafitte v. Schunamann

92 S.E. 295, 19 Ga. App. 799, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 369
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 25, 1917
Docket8309
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 295 (Lafitte v. Schunamann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lafitte v. Schunamann, 92 S.E. 295, 19 Ga. App. 799, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 369 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This suit was against the owner of an automobile, for injuries sustained by the plaintiff by reason of having been struck by the automobile. The evidence of the plaintiff showed, without contradiction, that the automobile, at the time it struck him, was being driven by one who ivas not in the employ of the owner of the automobile, and who was driving it without the knowledge or consent of the owner. Eeld, that the court did not err in granting a nonsuit. Fielder v. Davison, 139 Ga. 509 (77 S. E. 618); Wooley v. Doby, ante, 797.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Sheffield
173 S.E.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Johnson v. Webb-Crawford Co., Inc.
80 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Graham v. Cleveland
200 S.E. 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Samples v. Shaw
170 S.E. 389 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Whitelock v. Dennis
116 A. 68 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 295, 19 Ga. App. 799, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafitte-v-schunamann-gactapp-1917.