Lafferty v. Corcoran

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Lafferty v. Corcoran

34 A. 308, 175 Pa. 5, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1196

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 6, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 189·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the decree of tbe court below discharging defendant’s “ rule to show cause why the writ of attachment should not be quashed and attachment dissolved,” etc.

In the absence of any statutory authority for an appeal in such cases we have no power to review the action of the court below in the premises.

The writ of appeal is therefore quashed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the decree of tbe court below discharging defendant’s “ rule to show cause why the writ of attachment should not be quashed and attachment dissolved,” etc.

In the absence of any statutory authority for an appeal in such cases we have no power to review the action of the court below in the premises.

The writ of appeal is therefore quashed at appellant’s costs.

Lafferty v. Corcoran, 34 A. 308, 175 Pa. 5, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1196 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

34 A. 308 (Lafferty v. Corcoran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related