LaFemina v. LaFemina
57 A.D.3d 856, 868 N.Y.2d 920
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The defendant offered no basis upon which to set aside the court’s determination that, pursuant to the prenuptial agreement, the marital residence was the plaintiffs separate property.
The defendant’s remaining contentions were improperly raised for the first time in her reply brief (see Gorman v Town of Huntington, 47 AD3d 30, 39 [2007]). Skelos, J.E, Lifson, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LaFemina v. LaFemina, 57 A.D.3d 856, 868 N.Y.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 856 (LaFemina v. LaFemina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dune Deck Owners Corp. v. JJ & P Associates Corp.
71 A.D.3d 1075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Joseph v. New York City Transit Authority
66 A.D.3d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Jackson v. Tide Way Homes, Inc.
62 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)