Lafayette Elec. Mfg. Corp. v. United States
This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 882 (Lafayette Elec. Mfg. Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc. v. United States [883]*883(54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of earphones and microphones which are not suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, producing, or rectifying electrical energy and that said merchandise, in fact, consists of articles haring as an essential feature an electrical element or device, wholly or in chief value of metal, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Cust. Ct. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafayette-elec-mfg-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.