LaFAVER v. TIRE KINGDOM, INC.

350 S.W.3d 862, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1373, 2011 WL 4946814
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2011·No. ED 96316·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Christine LaFaver, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found in her favor on one of her claims brought under the Missouri Human Rights Act. On appeal, Appellant challenges the amount of attorneys’ fees awarded by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. Appellant's Motion for Attorneys’ Fees on appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaFAVER v. TIRE KINGDOM, INC., 350 S.W.3d 862, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1373, 2011 WL 4946814 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

350 S.W.3d 862 (LaFAVER v. TIRE KINGDOM, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pulaski Bank v. Benco Landscape Construction Company, Inc.
350 S.W.3d 862 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)