Laera v. Rosenbaum

Fourth Circuit

Laera v. Rosenbaum

677 F. App'x 104

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2017·No. No. 16-2388·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vito Antonio Laera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis[105] trict court. Laera v. Rosenbaum, No. 3:15-cv-00371-RJC-DCK, 2016 WL 6776638 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vito Antonio Laera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis[105] trict court. Laera v. Rosenbaum, No. 3:15-cv-00371-RJC-DCK, 2016 WL 6776638 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Laera v. Rosenbaum, 677 F. App'x 104 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

677 F. App'x 104 (Laera v. Rosenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related