Laedke v. Truesdale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laedke v. Truesdale

253 A.D. 921, 2 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9274

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county in favor of the defendant, in an action by an infant plaintiff for personal injuries and by his father for medical expenses, reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The court committed reversible error in its charge at folios 234 and 237, and by its comment at folio 237. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county in favor of the defendant, in an action by an infant plaintiff for personal injuries and by his father for medical expenses, reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The court committed reversible error in its charge at folios 234 and 237, and by its comment at folio 237. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.

Laedke v. Truesdale, 253 A.D. 921, 2 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

253 A.D. 921 (Laedke v. Truesdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.