Lady Attegrene Adams Express Trust v. Double Diamond, Inc.,et Al
This text of Lady Attegrene Adams Express Trust v. Double Diamond, Inc.,et Al (Lady Attegrene Adams Express Trust v. Double Diamond, Inc.,et Al) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion filed June 6, 2024
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________
No. 11-24-00116-CV ___________ ______ LADY ATTEGRENE ADAMS EXPRESS TRUST, Appellant V. DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., ET AL., Appellees
On Appeal from the 29th District Court Palo Pinto County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C51000
MEMORANDUM OPINION Victoria O’Brien, on behalf of Lady Attegrene Adams Express Trust, has filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s purported “judgment for dismissal” in the underlying case. When this appeal was docketed, the district clerk’s office informed this court that the trial court had not entered an order in the proceedings below. On May 9, 2024, the clerk of this court informed O’Brien by letter that it did not appear that the trial court had entered an appealable order. We requested O’Brien to respond and show grounds to continue this appeal. We also informed her that this appeal may be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. O’Brien responded and stated that “the judgment for dismissal was issued after a conventional trial on the merits for the trial held on April 9, 2024.” However, the district clerk’s office has informed this court that nothing has been filed after April 2, 2024, and that no final orders exist in the proceedings below. Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840–41 (Tex. 2007); Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). In this case, the trial court has not entered an appealable order in the proceedings below. Therefore, there is no appealable order for us to review, and we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
W. BRUCE WILLIAMS JUSTICE
June 6, 2024 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lady Attegrene Adams Express Trust v. Double Diamond, Inc.,et Al, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lady-attegrene-adams-express-trust-v-double-diamond-incet-al-texapp-2024.