LaDon Maurice Green v. State of Florida and Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 22, 2026
Docket5D2026-0431
StatusPublished

This text of LaDon Maurice Green v. State of Florida and Department of Corrections (LaDon Maurice Green v. State of Florida and Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaDon Maurice Green v. State of Florida and Department of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2026-0431 LT Case No. 16-2012-CF-7413-A _____________________________

LADON MAURICE GREEN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

LaDon Maurice Green, Century, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondents.

May 22, 2026

PER CURIAM.

Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit Court Case No. 16-2012-CF-7413-A, this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. In order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Duval County Circuit Court Case No. 16-2012-CF-7413-A. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

SANCTIONS IMPOSED.

JAY, C.J., and WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isley v. State
652 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Simpkins v. State
909 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
LaDon Maurice Green v. State of Florida and Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladon-maurice-green-v-state-of-florida-and-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2026.