Ladner v. Ladner
This text of 2 Miss. Dec. 607 (Ladner v. Ladner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion.
The decree is too broad in that it cancels the patent issued to the appellant, whereas the appellee has no valid claim to more than an undivided two-thirds interest in the land. In order to correct this error and limit the decree to the right of the complainant in the bill, the decree will be reversed and the cause remanded for a decree below in accordance with this view.
The patent should be ordered to be cancelled and the appellant be enjoined from using or attempting to use it as to an undivided two-thirds interest in the land described.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Miss. Dec. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladner-v-ladner-miss-1881.