Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc.

109 So. 2d 652, 236 Miss. 188, 1959 Miss. LEXIS 307

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 16, 1959

DocketNo. 41077

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 2d 652 (Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc., 109 So. 2d 652, 236 Miss. 188, 1959 Miss. LEXIS 307 (Mich. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Gillespie, J.

On the first appearance of this case, it was held that the bill of complaint stated a cause of action and we reversed the case and remanded it for a trial on the merits, 91 So. 2d 545. On remand, a lengthy hearing was had and the chancellor then entered a decree denying the relief sought by complainants and dismissed the complaint. After a careful review of the evidence adduced at the hearing on the merits, and after consideration of the [192]*192several assigments of error, we are of the opinion that the chancellor correctly denied the relief sought by complainants.

Affirmed.

McGehee, C. Jand Hall, Lee and Ethridge, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillespie, J.

On the first appearance of this case, it was held that the bill of complaint stated a cause of action and we reversed the case and remanded it for a trial on the merits, 91 So. 2d 545. On remand, a lengthy hearing was had and the chancellor then entered a decree denying the relief sought by complainants and dismissed the complaint. After a careful review of the evidence adduced at the hearing on the merits, and after consideration of the [192]*192several assigments of error, we are of the opinion that the chancellor correctly denied the relief sought by complainants.

Affirmed.

McGehee, C. Jand Hall, Lee and Ethridge, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 2d 652, 236 Miss. 188, 1959 Miss. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladner-v-hogue-lumber-supply-co-of-gulfport-inc-miss-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack