Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc.

109 So. 2d 652, 236 Miss. 188, 1959 Miss. LEXIS 307
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 16, 1959·No. No. 41077·Published

Opinion

Gillespie, J.

On the first appearance of this case, it was held that the bill of complaint stated a cause of action and we reversed the case and remanded it for a trial on the merits, 91 So. 2d 545. On remand, a lengthy hearing was had and the chancellor then entered a decree denying the relief sought by complainants and dismissed the complaint. After a careful review of the evidence adduced at the hearing on the merits, and after consideration of the [192]*192several assigments of error, we are of the opinion that the chancellor correctly denied the relief sought by complainants.

Affirmed.

McGehee, C. Jand Hall, Lee and Ethridge, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc., 109 So. 2d 652, 236 Miss. 188, 1959 Miss. LEXIS 307 (Mich. 1959).

109 So. 2d 652 (Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co. of Gulfport, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ladner v. Hogue Lumber & Supply Co.
91 So. 2d 545 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1956)