Ladicos v. Old Dominion University

Fourth Circuit

Ladicos v. Old Dominion University

328 F. App'x 216

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 2009

DocketNo. 09-1402

StatusPublished

This text of 328 F. App'x 216 (Ladicos v. Old Dominion University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ladicos v. Old Dominion University, 328 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Crist Ladicos seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ladicos’ brief alleges no error committed by the district court in dismissing his complaint, Ladicos has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the deci-sional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Crist Ladicos seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ladicos’ brief alleges no error committed by the district court in dismissing his complaint, Ladicos has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the deci-sional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F. App'x 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladicos-v-old-dominion-university-ca4-2009.