Ladicos v. Old Dominion University

Fourth Circuit

Ladicos v. Old Dominion University

328 F. App'x 216

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2009·No. No. 09-1402·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Crist Ladicos seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ladicos’ brief alleges no error committed by the district court in dismissing his complaint, Ladicos has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the deci-sional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Crist Ladicos seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ladicos’ brief alleges no error committed by the district court in dismissing his complaint, Ladicos has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the deci-sional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ladicos v. Old Dominion University, 328 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 216 (Ladicos v. Old Dominion University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.