Ladesso v. City of New York
Opinion
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.), entered April 18, 1995, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, dismissed the complaint.
[566]*566Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff’s contention that the court erred in delivering a missing witness charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPLR 4110-b, 4017, 5501 [a] [3]; De Long v County of Erie, 60 NY2d 296, 306), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (cf., Sluzar v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 223 AD2d 785).
We have reviewed the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find they are without merit. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
229 A.D.2d 565 (Ladesso v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.