Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick v. Michael Donnell Reddick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick v. Michael Donnell Reddick

DecidedOctober 11, 2017

DocketA18A0284

StatusPublished

This text of Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick v. Michael Donnell Reddick (Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick v. Michael Donnell Reddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick v. Michael Donnell Reddick, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 04, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0284. LADELLA MONIQUE HOLMES-REDDICK v. MICHAEL DONNELL REDDICK.

In this direct appeal, Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick, the wife in the divorce proceeding below, challenges the trial court’s order dismissing her appeal from the divorce decree.1 We lack jurisdiction because the trial court’s order is not subject to direct appeal. A trial court order dismissing a properly-filed appeal is subject to direct appeal. See Castleberry’s Food Co. v. Smith, 205 Ga. App. 859, 860 (424 SE2d 33) (1992). This appeal, however, stems from a divorce case, and a case’s underlying subject matter, not the relief awarded, determines whether an appellant has a right to direct appeal. See Best Tobacco, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, 269 Ga. App. 484, 485 (604 SE2d 578) (2004) (“[T]he underlying subject matter prevails over the procedural judgment and determines whether the appellant has a right to a direct appeal or whether the appellant must seek discretionary review.”). Divorce cases are domestic relations cases within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). Accordingly, the wife was required to file an application for discretionary appeal to obtain appellate review of the trial court’s order dismissing her appeal. Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

1 The trial court dismissed the appeal because it determined that the wife caused an unreasonable delay in securing the transcript of the motion for new trial hearing. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (c). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e , Atlanta,____________________ 10/04/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract f rom the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 04, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0284. LADELLA MONIQUE HOLMES-REDDICK v. MICHAEL DONNELL REDDICK.

In this direct appeal, Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick, the wife in the divorce proceeding below, challenges the trial court’s order dismissing her appeal from the divorce decree.1 We lack jurisdiction because the trial court’s order is not subject to direct appeal. A trial court order dismissing a properly-filed appeal is subject to direct appeal. See Castleberry’s Food Co. v. Smith, 205 Ga. App. 859, 860 (424 SE2d 33) (1992). This appeal, however, stems from a divorce case, and a case’s underlying subject matter, not the relief awarded, determines whether an appellant has a right to direct appeal. See Best Tobacco, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, 269 Ga. App. 484, 485 (604 SE2d 578) (2004) (“[T]he underlying subject matter prevails over the procedural judgment and determines whether the appellant has a right to a direct appeal or whether the appellant must seek discretionary review.”). Divorce cases are domestic relations cases within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). Accordingly, the wife was required to file an application for discretionary appeal to obtain appellate review of the trial court’s order dismissing her appeal. Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

1 The trial court dismissed the appeal because it determined that the wife caused an unreasonable delay in securing the transcript of the motion for new trial hearing. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (c). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e , Atlanta,____________________ 10/04/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract f rom the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ladella Monique Holmes-Reddick v. Michael Donnell Reddick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladella-monique-holmes-reddick-v-michael-donnell-reddick-gactapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack