Ladeairous v. Pearson

Fourth Circuit

Ladeairous v. Pearson

553 F. App'x 298

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2014·No. No. 13-7861·Published

Opinion

[299] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Ladeairous appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ladeairous v. Pearson, No. 3:12-cv-00807-JAG, 2013 WL 5962932 (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[299] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Ladeairous appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ladeairous v. Pearson, No. 3:12-cv-00807-JAG, 2013 WL 5962932 (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ladeairous v. Pearson, 553 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

553 F. App'x 298 (Ladeairous v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related