Ladd v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ladd v. Williams

72 S.W. 475, 100 Mo. App. 51, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 452

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ladd v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 Mo. App. 390 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 1903·Published

Opinion

GOODE, J.

Appellant’s abstract of the record in this ease contains no pleadings, nor digest of any, nor any statement of the ease, nor any showing that a bill of [52]*52exceptions was ever filed, in fact, nothing except the testimony. The case is therefore dismissed for failure to comply with the statutes (R. S. 1899, sec. 863), and the rules of this court. McCullom v. Ulen, 87 Mo. App. (St. L.) 606.

Bland, P. J., and Reybwrn, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOODE, J.

Appellant’s abstract of the record in this ease contains no pleadings, nor digest of any, nor any statement of the ease, nor any showing that a bill of [52]*52exceptions was ever filed, in fact, nothing except the testimony. The case is therefore dismissed for failure to comply with the statutes (R. S. 1899, sec. 863), and the rules of this court. McCullom v. Ulen, 87 Mo. App. (St. L.) 606.

Bland, P. J., and Reybwrn, J., concur.

Ladd v. Williams, 72 S.W. 475, 100 Mo. App. 51, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

72 S.W. 475 (Ladd v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.