Ladd v. Parnell
57 Cal. 232
Opinion
The judgment in this cause is affirmed. The sureties on the undertaking upon appeal were notified of the motion for judgment, and failed to appear. We see nothing in the point that § 942 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing judgment on motion against the sureties, where they have subscribed such an undertaking as is required by that section, is unconstitutional.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ladd v. Parnell, 57 Cal. 232 (Cal. 1881).
57 Cal. 232 (Ladd v. Parnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Heimbach
17 P. 199 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Baltimore
60 Cal. 617 (California Supreme Court, 1882)