Ladd v. Parnell
57 Cal. 232
This text of 57 Cal. 232 (Ladd v. Parnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ladd v. Parnell, 57 Cal. 232 (Cal. 1881).
Opinion
The judgment in this cause is affirmed. The sureties on the undertaking upon appeal were notified of the motion for judgment, and failed to appear. We see nothing in the point that § 942 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing judgment on motion against the sureties, where they have subscribed such an undertaking as is required by that section, is unconstitutional.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. Heimbach
17 P. 199 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Baltimore
60 Cal. 617 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 Cal. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladd-v-parnell-cal-1881.