Ladd v. Everett
This text of 522 A.2d 912 (Ladd v. Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
On appeal from a judgment of the District Court, Skowhegan, in favor of the plaintiffs, Lullyn and Georgie Ladd, the defendant, Robert Everett, urges reversal on a ground raised for the first time in the Superior Court on appeal. We decline to consider a ground of relief that the defendant did not present in the District Court. Reville v. Reville, 289 A.2d 695, 697-98 (Me.1972). In addition, we conclude that the limitation imposed upon cross-examination of a witness was within the scope of the District Court’s discretion. M.R.Evid. 611(a).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
522 A.2d 912, 1987 Me. LEXIS 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladd-v-everett-me-1987.