Lacy v. State

412 S.W.2d 911, 1966 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 937
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 22, 1966
Docket40230
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 412 S.W.2d 911 (Lacy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lacy v. State, 412 S.W.2d 911, 1966 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 937 (Tex. 1966).

Opinion

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is injuring property belonging to another (Art. 1350, Sec. 1(a) Vernon’s Ann.P.C.); the punishment, 2 years.

The record approved by the trial court reflects no statement of the evidence adduced and no brief was filed in the trial court by appellant.

The indictment was attacked in the trial court as void by motion to quash and again by motion in arrest of judgment. The motions were overruled and exception taken.

As read to the jury, the indictment alleged that appellant did wilfully and mischievously and without the consent of the owner “injure and destroy certain property, to wit, drapes, windows, gas light, window air conditioners, rugs, and walls” by “cutting, tearing, ripping, and breaking the same and defecating upon the said rugs, in-' flicting damage and injury to the same of the value of over $50.00.”

The quoted portion of the indictment sufficiently alleged that the property described was injured. It was not necessary that the extent of the injury to each article of property be alleged.

The court’s charge authorized the jury to convict if they found that appellant wil-fully injured drapes and rugs without the consent of the owner, the extent of the injury inflicted being of the value of $50.-00 or more.

The indictment is sufficient though it does not allege the value or extent of the damages to the drapes and rugs separately.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawley v. State
513 S.W.2d 62 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Wise v. State
494 S.W.2d 921 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Johnson v. State
467 S.W.2d 247 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Barber v. State
449 S.W.2d 53 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Steambarge v. State
440 S.W.2d 68 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 S.W.2d 911, 1966 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-state-texcrimapp-1966.