Lacy v. State
134 S.E. 202, 35 Ga. App. 662, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063
This text of 134 S.E. 202 (Lacy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lacy v. State, 134 S.E. 202, 35 Ga. App. 662, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Lacy was convicted of violating a criminal statute and attempted to certiorari his case to the superior court. The judge of the superior court properly denied the petition for certiorari. Lacy had a legal trial, and a conviction was fully authorized.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 202, 35 Ga. App. 662, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-state-gactapp-1926.