Lacy v. State

638 So. 2d 57, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1994 WL 245741
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1994
DocketNo. 81615
StatusPublished

This text of 638 So. 2d 57 (Lacy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lacy v. State, 638 So. 2d 57, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1994 WL 245741 (Fla. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Lacy v. State, 614 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on constitutional construction. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently resolved the issue presented in this case in Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994), where we found a due process violation when police used illegally manufactured drugs in a reverse-sting operation. On authority of Metcalf we quash the decision under review.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, Senior Justice, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metcalf v. State
635 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Lacy v. State
614 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 So. 2d 57, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1994 WL 245741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-state-fla-1994.