Lacy v. State

638 So. 2d 57, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1994 WL 245741
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 9, 1994·No. No. 81615·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Lacy v. State, 614 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on constitutional construction. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently resolved the issue presented in this case in Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994), where we found a due process violation when police used illegally manufactured drugs in a reverse-sting operation. On authority of Metcalf we quash the decision under review.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, Senior Justice, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacy v. State, 638 So. 2d 57, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1994 WL 245741 (Fla. 1994).

638 So. 2d 57 (Lacy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metcalf v. State
635 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Lacy v. State
614 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)