Lacy v. State

639 So. 2d 955, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 88, 1994 WL 63528
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lacy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 So. 2d 688
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 4, 1994·No. CR-91-1073·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

McMillan, judge.

Based on the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision in Ex parte Lacy, 639 So.2d 951 (Ala.1993), the trial court’s judgment is due to be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court and that court is ordered to grant the appellant a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacy v. State, 639 So. 2d 955, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 88, 1994 WL 63528 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

639 So. 2d 955 (Lacy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Lacy
639 So. 2d 951 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)