Lacy v. Solvay Process Co.

240 A.D. 751

This text of 240 A.D. 751 (Lacy v. Solvay Process Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lacy v. Solvay Process Co., 240 A.D. 751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The measure of damages in this case is to be based upon the loss suffered by the plaintiff and not the value to the defendant of the water taken. (New York Rubber Co. v. Rothery, 132 N. Y. 293; Colrick v. Swinburne, 105 id. 503; City of Syracuse v. Stacey, 169 id. 231; Coatsworth v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 115 App. Div. 7.) The quantity of water used in the defendant’s mill and the character of the use are subjects not material to the proof of plaintiff’s damages and consequently are not necessary or material to the plaintiff in the prosecution of his action and should be excluded from the examination of the defendant which is allowed. All concur. Order modified by striking out provision for examination on certain subjects and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Rubber Co. v. Rothery
30 N.E. 841 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Coatsworth v. Lehigh Valley Railway Co.
115 A.D. 7 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-solvay-process-co-nyappdiv-1933.