Lacy v. Langford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Lacy v. Langford

110 So. 916, 215 Ala. 698

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 4, 1926·No. 8 Div. 870.·Published

Opinion

BOULDIN,- J.

The will of Adeline White was contested on the grounds of mental incapacity and undue influence. Verdict was for the contestants. The appeal presents for review the, decision of the trial court denying a motion for a new trial, the grounds of which were the refusal of the affirmative charge for proponent and that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. Upon a consideration of the whole evidence, we do not find that the judgment should be disturbed. It is affirmed.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOULDIN,- J.

The will of Adeline White was contested on the grounds of mental incapacity and undue influence. Verdict was for the contestants. The appeal presents for review the, decision of the trial court denying a motion for a new trial, the grounds of which were the refusal of the affirmative charge for proponent and that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. Upon a consideration of the whole evidence, we do not find that the judgment should be disturbed. It is affirmed.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Lacy v. Langford, 110 So. 916, 215 Ala. 698 (Ala. 1926).

Pincite

110 So. 916 (Lacy v. Langford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.