Lacy v. Langford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Lacy v. Langford

110 So. 916, 215 Ala. 698

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 4, 1926

Docket8 Div. 870.

StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 916 (Lacy v. Langford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacy v. Langford, 110 So. 916, 215 Ala. 698 (Ala. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BOULDIN,- J.

The will of Adeline White was contested on the grounds of mental incapacity and undue influence. Verdict was for the contestants. The appeal presents for review the, decision of the trial court denying a motion for a new trial, the grounds of which were the refusal of the affirmative charge for proponent and that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. Upon a consideration of the whole evidence, we do not find that the judgment should be disturbed. It is affirmed.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOULDIN,- J.

The will of Adeline White was contested on the grounds of mental incapacity and undue influence. Verdict was for the contestants. The appeal presents for review the, decision of the trial court denying a motion for a new trial, the grounds of which were the refusal of the affirmative charge for proponent and that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. Upon a consideration of the whole evidence, we do not find that the judgment should be disturbed. It is affirmed.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 916, 215 Ala. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-langford-ala-1926.