Lacy v. Holiday Management Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Lacy v. Holiday Management Company

513 P.2d 394, 85 N.M. 460

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 13, 1973

Docket9655

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 513 P.2d 394 (Lacy v. Holiday Management Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacy v. Holiday Management Company, 513 P.2d 394, 85 N.M. 460 (N.M. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

STEPHENSON, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant sued, alleging breach of fiducial obligations owed him as a result of a partnership of which he had been a member.

The trial court’s decision included findings of fact consistent with honesty and fair dealing on the part of the defendants-appellees and inconsistent with appellant’s factual predicate. It also denied findings of fact requested by appellant which were essential to his case.

In attempting to attack these actions of the trial court, appellant’s brief falls far short of compliance with the second paragraph of Supreme Court Rule 15(6) [§ 21-2-1(15) (6), N.M.S.A.1953]. Compliance with portions of Supreme Court Rule 15 (16) (b) and (c) [§ 21-2-1 (15) (16) (b & c), N.M.S.A.1953] ranges from slight to none.

We will accordingly consider the matter no further. The judgment from which the appeal is taken is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

McMANUS, C. J., and MONTOYA, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI