Lacy v. Ezzard
243 U.S. 631, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1593
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U. S. 1; Capital National Bank v. First National Bank of Cadiz, 172 U. S. 425; Union National Bank v. McBoyle, 243 U. S. 26. (2) Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Albers Commission Co., 223 U. S. 573, 591; Creswill v. Knights of Pythias, 225 U. S. 246, 261; Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. West Virginia, 236 U. S. 605, 609-610. (3) Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 60l, 611-612.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lacy v. Ezzard, 243 U.S. 631, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1593 (1917).
243 U.S. 631 (Lacy v. Ezzard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. Douglas
1934 OK 651 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Roxana Petroleum Co. v. Covington State Bank
1924 OK 413 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)