Lacy v. Ezzard

Supreme Court

Lacy v. Ezzard

243 U.S. 631, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1593

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 16, 1917

DocketNo. 619

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 243 U.S. 631 (Lacy v. Ezzard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacy v. Ezzard, 243 U.S. 631, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1593 (1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U. S. 1; Capital National Bank v. First National Bank of Cadiz, 172 U. S. 425; Union National Bank v. McBoyle, 243 U. S. 26. (2) Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Albers Commission Co., 223 U. S. 573, 591; Creswill v. Knights of Pythias, 225 U. S. 246, 261; Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. West Virginia, 236 U. S. 605, 609-610. (3) Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 60l, 611-612.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co., 161 U. S. 1; Capital National Bank v. First National Bank of Cadiz, 172 U. S. 425; Union National Bank v. McBoyle, 243 U. S. 26. (2) Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Albers Commission Co., 223 U. S. 573, 591; Creswill v. Knights of Pythias, 225 U. S. 246, 261; Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. West Virginia, 236 U. S. 605, 609-610. (3) Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler, 227 U. S. 60l, 611-612.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 U.S. 631, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-ezzard-scotus-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack