Lacy v. Commissioner
309 F. App'x 73
This text of 309 F. App'x 73 (Lacy v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lacy v. Commissioner, 309 F. App'x 73 (8th Cir. 2009).
Opinion
Michael Lacy challenges the tax court’s1 order dismissing his pro se petition and imposing a $7,500 penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673. After careful review, we conclude that the dismissal and the penalty were each proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. All pending motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sanctions and costs awarded by courts
26 U.S.C. § 6673
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
309 F. App'x 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-v-commissioner-ca8-2009.