Lacy, Quan Montrell
This text of Lacy, Quan Montrell (Lacy, Quan Montrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,435-02
EX PARTE QUAN MONTRELL LACY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 60551-A IN THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT FROM WICHITA COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of arson and sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment in State Jail.
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he is being denied diligent participation credit on his sentence.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. arts.
42.03, 42A.559, 42.0199. Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the
appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court
shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a
response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court 2
may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall
determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by
counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this
Court of counsel’s name.
The response shall include Applicant’s sentence begin date and his maximum discharge date.
The response shall also state whether Applicant presented a claim to the time credit resolution
system of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and, if so, the date the claim was presented.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, before filing
this application, Applicant properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by Section
501.0081(b) of the Government Code. The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as
to whether Applicant is receiving diligent participation credit on his sentence. The trial court may
make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 23, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lacy, Quan Montrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-quan-montrell-texcrimapp-2021.