Lacy Atzin v. Anthem, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedSeptember 17, 2019
Docket2:17-cv-06816
StatusUnknown

This text of Lacy Atzin v. Anthem, Inc. (Lacy Atzin v. Anthem, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lacy Atzin v. Anthem, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2019).

Opinion

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12

13 LACY ATZIN; MARK ANDERSEN, ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-6816 ODW (PLAx) 14 on behalf of themselves and all others ) Assigned to Hon.: OTIS D. WRIGHT, II 15 similarly situated, ) ) PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 Plaintiffs, ) 17 ) v. ) 18 ) 19 ANTHEM, INC.; ANTHEM UM ) SERVICES, INC., ) 20 ) 21 Defendants. ) _________________________________) 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 2 good cause, the Court issues this Protective Order (the “Order”). Unless modified, 3 this Order shall remain in effect through the conclusion of this litigation: 4 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 5 The parties acknowledge that information produced in discovery, 6 regardless of its designation under this Order, may contain personal and health 7 information subject to the protections of, inter alia, the Health Insurance Portability 8 and Accountability Act of 1996, the applicable requirements of the Standards for 9 Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information and its implementing 10 regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (45 C.F.R. 11 Parts 160-64; HIPAA Privacy Regulations), and California Civil Code §§ 56 et seq., 12 and 1798.82 et seq., which protect the confidentiality of individually-identifiable 13 personal and health information. Discovery may also involve trade secrets, customer 14 and pricing lists and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, 15 technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public 16 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is 17 warranted. 18 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 19 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 20 protect information the parties are entitled or required to keep confidential, to ensure 21 that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in 22 preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the 23 litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is 24 justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be 25 designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated 26 without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 27 manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this 28 case. 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 3 1. A document constitutes or contains “Confidential Material” when it has 4 been given that designation by the party producing it or by the party to whom the 5 information relates (“the Designating Party”). A party or nonparty may designate 6 documents or information as “Confidential Material” as follows: 7 a. In the case of documents and information contained in documents, 8 designation must be made by placing the following legend on each page of the 9 document before production: 10 “CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 11 b. In the case of discovery responses and information contained in 12 discovery responses, designation must be made by (i) placing a statement at the start 13 or end of the responses specifying that the responses, or part of the responses, are 14 designated Confidential Material, and (ii) placing the following legend on each page 15 (including the caption page) of any discovery response containing designated 16 Confidential Material: 17 “CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 18 c. In the case of depositions and hearings, designation of the portions 19 of the transcript (including exhibits) that contain Confidential Material must be made 20 by the Designating Party by: (i) making a statement to that effect on the record in the 21 course of the deposition or hearing; or (ii) sending a letter to all counsel within the 22 time permitted for the review and signing of the deposition by the witness (in the 23 event of a deposition) or within 45 days of receipt of the transcript of the hearing (in 24 the event of a hearing). Once designated, the original and each copy of the transcript 25 that contains Confidential Material must bear (or must be modified by counsel to 26 bear) the following legend on its cover: 27 “CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 28 2 following types of documents and information: 3 a. information that is proprietary or constitutes a trade secret, 4 including, without limitation, information, materials, and other documents reflecting 5 non-public business or financial strategies and confidential competitive information 6 that, if disclosed, could result in prejudice or harm to the disclosing party; 7 b. non-public financial or business information; 8 c. non-public communications with regulators, Departments of 9 Insurance, or other governmental bodies that are intended to be kept confidential or 10 are protected from disclosure by statute or regulation; and 11 d. policyholder-specific information, including private medical 12 information. 13 2.1 Any copies or reproductions, excerpts, summaries, or other documents 14 or media that contain or incorporate Confidential Material as defined above will also 15 be treated as Confidential Material under this Order. 16 2.2 Nothing in this Order will be construed as requiring Defendant to 17 produce any personal or identifying information regarding any individual or any other 18 policyholder, nor policyholder information that is protected from disclosure under 19 applicable state or federal law. 20 3. Confidential Material may be used solely for the purpose of conducting 21 this litigation and not for any other purpose whatsoever. For the purpose of 22 conducting this litigation, Confidential Material may be used by, copied by, exhibited 23 to, or disclosed to the following persons or entities only: 24 a. The parties to this action; 25 b. The parties’ attorneys and their respective employees; 26 c. Any witness from whom testimony is taken or will be taken in this 27 action, except that the witness may be shown copies of Confidential Material only 28 2 extent 3 relevant to the testimony. The witness may not retain any Confidential Material; 4 d. Consultants, experts, and investigators employed by the parties or 5 their attorneys in the prosecution or defense of any aspect of this litigation; 6 e. Court reporters used in connection with this action and their 7 employees; 8 f. The jury, if any, in the trial of this case; and 9 g. The Court and its staff. 10 4. No disclosure may be made to any person under Paragraphs 3(c), (d) or 11 (e) until that person has executed an “Understanding and Agreement” in the form 12 attached as Exhibit A. With respect to consultants, experts, and investigators 13 employed by the parties to this litigation, Exhibit A must be fully executed by the 14 consultant, expert, or investigator and retained by counsel for the party employing the 15 consultant, expert, or investigator. In the event that any consultant, expert, or 16 investigator employed by the parties to this litigation ceases to be engaged in the 17 preparation of this Action, access by such person to discovery material designated as 18 Confidential shall be terminated. Any such material in the possession of any such 19 person shall be returned or destroyed. The provisions of this Order and the 20 obligations not to disclose any portions of such material shall remain in full force and 21 effect as to all such persons. 22 5. All persons described in paragraphs 2(a) through (f) above are prohibited 23 from disclosing any portion of Confidential Material to any other person, or from 24 using any information obtained from the Confidential Material, except as permitted 25 by this Order. 26 6. Nothing in this Order prevents the use of information that is publicly 27 available.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hilario R. Alvarado, Madel Socorro
5 F.3d 1425 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lacy Atzin v. Anthem, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacy-atzin-v-anthem-inc-cacd-2019.