Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano & Shell Fertilizer Co.

New York Supreme Court

Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano & Shell Fertilizer Co.

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 320

DecidedOctober 15, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 320 (Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano & Shell Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano & Shell Fertilizer Co., 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 320 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying the defendant’s motion for leave to withdraw demurrer and to answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, unless defendant, within twenty days after service of taxed bills, pays all of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements in this action accrued since the service of the complaint (not already paid), including said costs of this appeal, and delivers to the plaintiff’s attorney an undertaking executed by the defendant and two sufficient sureties, each of whom shall justify in the sum of $10,000, to be approved by a justice of this court, conditioned that the defendant will pay any judgment that shall be recovered against it in this action, and that it will not remove any of the marl in dispute until the final determination of this action, unless sooner permitted to do so by the order' of this court, in which case the order appealed from is reversed and the defendant’s motion for leave, etc., is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying the defendant’s motion for leave to withdraw demurrer and to answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, unless defendant, within twenty days after service of taxed bills, pays all of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements in this action accrued since the service of the complaint (not already paid), including said costs of this appeal, and delivers to the plaintiff’s attorney an undertaking executed by the defendant and two sufficient sureties, each of whom shall justify in the sum of $10,000, to be approved by a justice of this court, conditioned that the defendant will pay any judgment that shall be recovered against it in this action, and that it will not remove any of the marl in dispute until the final determination of this action, unless sooner permitted to do so by the order' of this court, in which case the order appealed from is reversed and the defendant’s motion for leave, etc., is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacustrine-fertilizer-co-v-lake-guano-shell-fertilizer-co-nysupct-1881.