LaCroix v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
This text of 338 So. 2d 112 (LaCroix v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James E. LaCROIX et al.
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.
DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted to clarify, if we can, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc. and the per curiam on the denial of rehearing. If anything is clear, it is that Hero does not require ultra-hazardous activity before the neighbors can recover loss of value caused by a 667 violation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
338 So. 2d 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacroix-v-travelers-indemnity-co-la-1976.