LaCroix v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

LaCroix v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

338 So. 2d 112

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 22, 1976·No. 58432·Published

Opinion

338 So.2d 112 (1976)

James E. LaCROIX et al.
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. et al.

No. 58432.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 22, 1976.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted to clarify, if we can, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc. and the per curiam on the denial of rehearing. If anything is clear, it is that Hero does not require ultra-hazardous activity before the neighbors can recover loss of value caused by a 667 violation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

338 So.2d 112 (1976)

James E. LaCROIX et al.
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. et al.

No. 58432.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 22, 1976.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted to clarify, if we can, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc. and the per curiam on the denial of rehearing. If anything is clear, it is that Hero does not require ultra-hazardous activity before the neighbors can recover loss of value caused by a 667 violation.

LaCroix v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 338 So. 2d 112 (La. 1976).

Pincite

338 So. 2d 112 (LaCroix v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

James E. LaCROIX et al. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. et al.

James E. LaCROIX et al.
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. et al.