Lacoy v. IAC

Fourth Circuit

Lacoy v. IAC

566 F. App'x 269

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2507

StatusPublished

This text of 566 F. App'x 269 (Lacoy v. IAC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacoy v. IAC, 566 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Andrew Lacoy appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief [270]*270in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lacoy v. IAC, No. 3:13-cv-00273-MOC-DCK, 2013 WL 6056597 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2013). Lacoy’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Andrew Lacoy appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief [270]*270in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lacoy v. IAC, No. 3:13-cv-00273-MOC-DCK, 2013 WL 6056597 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2013). Lacoy’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacoy-v-iac-ca4-2014.