Lacorte v. Cytryn

New York Court of Appeals

Lacorte v. Cytryn

995 N.E.2d 170, 21 N.Y.3d 1022

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 22, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 995 N.E.2d 170 (Lacorte v. Cytryn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacorte v. Cytryn, 995 N.E.2d 170, 21 N.Y.3d 1022 (N.Y. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the Board petitioner claimed were erroneous (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI