Lacorte v. Cytryn
995 N.E.2d 170, 21 N.Y.3d 1022
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the Board petitioner claimed were erroneous (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lacorte v. Cytryn, 995 N.E.2d 170, 21 N.Y.3d 1022 (N.Y. 2013).
995 N.E.2d 170 (Lacorte v. Cytryn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Miriville-Shahzada v. Board of Elections in the City of N.Y.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Matter of Kennedy v. Board of Elections in the City of N.Y.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Matter of Rowlands v. Baker
195 N.Y.S.3d 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Hennessy v. Oneida County Bd. of Elections
217 A.D.3d 1452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Sanon v. Marte
167 N.Y.S.3d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Wagner v. Elasser
2021 NY Slip Op 03135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Maio v. McNamara
2020 NY Slip Op 1274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)