Lacore v. Leonard

California Supreme Court

Lacore v. Leonard

45 Cal. 394

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1873

DocketNo. 3,105

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 45 Cal. 394 (Lacore v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacore v. Leonard, 45 Cal. 394 (Cal. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The plaintiff’s lien had expired before his action was-commenced. He took judgment foreclosing the lien, and directing a sale of the property by default; but on the next [395]*395day, the matter being called to the attention of the Court, it was ordered that the judgment be so modified as to give him a money judgment only. There was no error in the action of the Court in this respect.

J udgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The plaintiff’s lien had expired before his action was-commenced. He took judgment foreclosing the lien, and directing a sale of the property by default; but on the next [395]*395day, the matter being called to the attention of the Court, it was ordered that the judgment be so modified as to give him a money judgment only. There was no error in the action of the Court in this respect.

J udgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Cal. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacore-v-leonard-cal-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack