LaComba v. Eagle Home Loans and Investment LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY LEE LACOMBA, SR. & No. 2:23-cv-0370 KJM DB ROCHELLE LOUISE LACOMBA, 12 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. 15 EAGLE HOME LOANS AND INVESTMENT, LLC & DEL TORO 16 LOAN SERVICES, INC.,

17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiffs commenced this action on February 27, 2023, by filing a complaint. (ECF No. 20 1.) On April 19, 2023, a Clerk’s entry of default was entered as to defendant Del Toro Loan 21 Services, Inc., pursuant to plaintiff’s request. (ECF No. 16.) On July 17, 2023, plaintiffs filed a 22 motion for default judgment against defendant Del Toro Loan Services, Inc., and noticed the 23 motion for hearing before the undersigned on August 25, 2023, pursuant to Local Rule 24 302(c)(19). (ECF Nos. 32 & 33.) 25 However, on July 17, 2023 plaintiffs also filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 30.) No 26 default has been entered as to any defendant with respect to the amended complaint. And 27 plaintiffs filing of an amended complaint rendered defendant’s default on the original complaint 28 void. See Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 2010) (“As a general rule, when a 1 | plaintiff files an amended complaint, the amended complaint supercedes the original, the latter 2 | being treated thereafter as non-existent.”). In this regard, “after amendment the original pleading 3 | no longer performs any function[.]” Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). 4 | “Consequently, default judgment on the Amended Complaint would be improper because no 5 || default has been entered on the Amended Complaint.” ThermoLife Intern., LLC v. Sechel 6 | Holdings, Inc., No. CV 14-2291 PHX JAT, 2015 WL 1521779, at *2 (D. Ariz. Apr. 3, 2015). 7 | Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, therefore, will be denied without prejudice to renewal as 8 | having been rendered moot. Nelson v. Nationwide Mortg. Corp., 659 F. Supp. 611, 615 (D. D.C. 9 | 1987) (“In light of Nelson’s filing of an amended complaint, her motions for entry of default 10 | judgments against Nationwide, Tillette, and Butler must be denied as moot.”’). 11 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 12 1. Plaintiffs’ July 17, 2023 motion for default judgment (ECF No. 32) is denied without 13 || prejudice to renewal as having been rendered moot; and 14 2. The August 25, 2023 hearing of plaintiffs’ motion is vacated. 15 | Dated: August 23, 2023

17 18 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.civil\lacomba0370.mdj.cont.ord 24 25 26 27 28