Lacomb v. Her Husband

8 La. Ann. 485
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Rost, J.

There is nothing in the record to show the embarrassments of the husband, which render a separation of property necessary.

A judgment of separation of property, obtained under those circumstances, is held in law to be collusive; and although we cannot reverse it without a prayer of the appellee to that effect, we do not feel bound to amend it as prayed for by the appellant. No amendment made by us would give it validity against the "husband’s creditors.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacomb v. Her Husband, 8 La. Ann. 485 (La. 1852).

8 La. Ann. 485 (Lacomb v. Her Husband) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. Stinger
46 F.2d 321 (W.D. Louisiana, 1930)
Gomila v. Wilcombe
151 F. 470 (Fifth Circuit, 1907)