Lacognata v. Hospira, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Lacognata v. Hospira, Inc.

521 F. App'x 866

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 7, 2013·No. No. 12-14078·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer Lacognata appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of her complaint. She contends that the district court erred when it concluded that she failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Having carefully considered the record and the parties’ briefs and having heard oral argument, we AFFIRM based on the reasons stated in the district court’s order, Lacognata v. Hospira, Inc., 2012 WL 6962884 (M.D.Fla. July 2, 2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer Lacognata appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of her complaint. She contends that the district court erred when it concluded that she failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Having carefully considered the record and the parties’ briefs and having heard oral argument, we AFFIRM based on the reasons stated in the district court’s order, Lacognata v. Hospira, Inc., 2012 WL 6962884 (M.D.Fla. July 2, 2012).

Lacognata v. Hospira, Inc., 521 F. App'x 866 (11th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

521 F. App'x 866 (Lacognata v. Hospira, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related