Lackritz v. Petersen

31 F. Supp. 415, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3609
District Court, E.D. New York·Decided January 9, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HULBERT, District Judge.

Respondent moves for an order sustaining exceptions to the libel and invokes the 22nd Rule in Admiralty following 28 U.S. C.A. § 723.

It is the settled law that the owner of a shipyard who takes a vessel into his custody and control is a bailee. International Mercantile Marine S. S. Co. v. W. & A. Fletcher Co., 2 Cir., 296 F. 855; PanAmerican Petroleum Transportation Co. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co., 2 Cir., 281 F. 97; United States v. Newport News. Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., D.C., 21 F.2d 112, reversed on other grounds, 4 Cir.,. 34 F.2d 100. Although the ultimate liability of the bailee must depend upon the establishment of negligence, Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transportation Co., 3 Cir., 40 F.2d 249, his failure to redeliver the vessel raises a presumption of negligence. Alpine Forwarding Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 734.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lackritz v. Petersen, 31 F. Supp. 415, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3609 (E.D.N.Y. 1940).

31 F. Supp. 415 (Lackritz v. Petersen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren L. Graham, Inc. v. Marine Const. Co.
49 F. Supp. 780 (D. Delaware, 1942)