Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers

29 A.D.3d 744, 813 N.Y.S.2d 917

This text of 29 A.D.3d 744 (Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers, 29 A.D.3d 744, 813 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered June 30, 2005, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff provided sufficient circumstantial evidence to raise a triable issue of fact as to the defendant’s negligence (see Lerner v Luna Park Hous. Corp., 19 AD3d 553 [2005]; Sweeney v D & J Vending, 291 AD2d 443 [2002]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lerner v. Luna Park Housing Corp.
19 A.D.3d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Sweeney v. D & J Vending, Inc.
291 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.3d 744, 813 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lackowitz-v-city-of-yonkers-nyappdiv-2006.