Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers

29 A.D.3d 744, 813 N.Y.S.2d 912
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 2006·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered September 2, 2005, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 4102 (e) for leave to file a late jury demand.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff served a note of issue which did not request a jury trial. The defendant did not thereafter timely request a jury trial, and thus, waived its right to a jury trial (see CPLR 4102 [a]). About seven months after being served with the note of issue, the defendant moved for leave to serve and file a demand for a jury trial. The Supreme Court providently denied the defendant’s motion. The defendant’s excuse that counsel inadvertently failed to notice that the plaintiffs note of issue did not request a jury trial was inadequate (see Fertik v Fertik, 264 AD2d 463, 464 [1999]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers, 29 A.D.3d 744, 813 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

29 A.D.3d 744 (Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santiago v. Boyer
2021 NY Slip Op 02435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Ballinger v. Stelle Architects, PLLC
2019 NY Slip Op 2668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Bodenmiller v. Thermo Tech Combustion, Inc.
80 A.D.3d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Garrido v. International Business Machine Corp.
38 A.D.3d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)