Lackland v. Rogers

113 Ala. 529
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

Under statutory provisions having reference to proceedings when an execution from a justice’s court is levied on land, and to the time and manner of interposing a claim of exemption of the land so levied on, as the homestead of the defendant, it is settled by the decisions of this court that such claim is effectually waived and lost as against such execution unless it be interposed before air order for the sale of the land is made by the circuit court.-Sherry v. Brown, 66 Ala. 51; Toenes v. Moog, 78 Ala. 558.

The claim of homestead exemption was not made in this case until long after the order of sale had been entered by the circuit court. It came too late : and on the issue of exemption vel non the court should have given the affirmative charge requested by the plaintiff in execution.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lackland v. Rogers, 113 Ala. 529 (Ala. 1896).

113 Ala. 529 (Lackland v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poole v. Griffith
112 So. 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Hill v. Hooper
110 So. 323 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Cross v. Bank of Ensley
87 So. 843 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Rogers v. Lackland
117 Ala. 599 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1897)