Lackey v. State
This text of 145 So. 920 (Lackey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By indictment, duly preferred and returned, this appellant was charged with the offense of assault with intent to murder; the *650 specific charge being that he unlawfully and with malice aforethought did assault James Grigsby with a rifle with the intent to murder him. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of assault with intent to murder as charged, and the court fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than three nor more than four years. Judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered, from which this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper only, and, this being regular in all things, •the judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 So. 920, 25 Ala. App. 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lackey-v-state-alactapp-1933.