Lackey v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lackey v. Director of Revenue

892 S.W.2d 825, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 298

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 1995·No. No. 66298·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the trial court sustaining the Director of Revenue’s suspension of his driving privileges. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order af-[826]*826finning the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the trial court sustaining the Director of Revenue’s suspension of his driving privileges. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order af-[826]*826finning the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Lackey v. Director of Revenue, 892 S.W.2d 825, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 298 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

892 S.W.2d 825 (Lackey v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.